Saturday, September 24, 2016


JOB/ROLES IN THE ECE COMMUNITY:
NATIONAL & FEDERAL LEVEL  

In review of several organizations for this week’s Blog Assignment, I researched and have come across several that I have found to be of interest.  Their work has provided millions with support and educational resources that has benefited children, families and communities. The first organization is the Administration for Children & Families (ACF). The organization is part of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Its vision is geared towards children, youth, families, individuals and communities who are resilient, safe, healthy, and economically secure.  Their mission is to foster the health and well-being by providing federal leadership, partnership and resources for the compassionate and effective delivery of human services.  As a large agency, they are responsible for federal stewardship of a set of programs that provide essential services and support for millions of Americans (Administration for Children & Families, 2016).

 The second organization that appealed to me is the National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC). Within my professional career, I am employed as a family child care program director.  My program encourages our FCC providers to obtain their credential as a NAFCC provider.  The organization is the only professional association dedicated solely to promoting high-quality early childhood experiences for children in the unique environment of family child care programs. Currently, there are approximately one million in-home family child care providers operating nationwide. The program is a 501(c3) non-profit association. The organization also seeks to accomplish important goals that are necessary to continue to become an elite organization. One of their goals is to ensure that family child care is the early childhood workforce.  And training and professional development offered to our providers has to make sense for the family child care environment, and be made accessible to work-life of family child care providers (NAFCC, 2016).   

The third organization that appealed to me is the International Child Resource Institute (ICRI) which is located in California. This is an organization that I was not aware of until now. I stumbled across their site as I was seeking to learn more about federal and national organizations. Their mission is “to envision a world in which all children and families are able to fulfill their greatest potential” (ICRI, 2016).  As I searched their site, I noticed that they offer a community of practice that is geared towards Early Childhood Care and Education, Children’s Rights, Maternal and Child Health, Empowerment of Women and Girls, and Grassroots Community Development. Their work is centered on the well-being of children on a national and international level. Their organization was birthed out of California but has expanded. 

 In addition to the various programs the ICRI focuses on, they have developed an advocacy program titled, I-CAN. Their motto is “if I-CAN, you can”.  Their motive is to assist any stakeholder involved in the lives of children (including parents) to become skilled advocates. I-CAN supports advocates through any array of services to ensure that advocacy for children will become year round and will lead to potentially stunning future results for children and families all over the world (ICRI, 2016).  

In review of employment, none of the organizations listed had any official job openings available. However, I did review ICRI’s team member’s positions they currently hold. One that was of interest is that of the Family Daycare Support Network Director.  This position provides nutrition education and financial support to family daycare providers within various communities. Since I already have some background knowledge in the family child care capacity, branching out into the educational resource and training capacity in the nutrition area would be an asset.   The position also requires knowledge of financial services in which skills in the administration area is needed.  This would fit into my undergrad degree in Business Administration as well as my degree in M.S. in Early Childhood Studies with the specialization in Administration, Management and Leadership. Branching out in this capacity would be a great experience and professional development experience and booster (ICRI, 2016).  

References:

Administration  for Children & Families. (2016) Retrieved from,

          http://www.acf.hhs.gov/

National Association for Family Child Care. (2016). Retrieved from


International Child Resource Institute. (2016). Retrieved from,

          http://www.icrichild.org

 

 

 

 

Saturday, September 10, 2016



EXPLORING ROLES IN THE ECE COMMUNITY:

LOCAL AND STATE LEVELS  

This week's assignment required that we search for organizations, agencies and/or a community of practice that is of interest.  In doing so, I came across several that I would be interested in learning more about. The Association for Early Learning Leaders (AELL) was the initial organization that I found. The organization is a non-profit 501 (c) (3) that has been serving directors, owners, and administrators of early care and education programs. AELL is committed to excellence in the field of Early Care and Education by promoting leadership development and enhancing program quality. Their goal is to strengthen the knowledge, skills and abilities of directors, owners, emerging leaders and other learning professionals to ensure quality programs for young children. In addition, their primary purpose as an organization and community of practice is "networking and collaboration" among its members and other professionals and national early childhood organizations. This is an organization that has a lot to offer and one that I would seriously become part of. Learning about groups and organizations that help further develop my passion and personal profession is a great step towards building my knowledge in the field. Membership cost is average and would be worthwhile to further pursue (AELL, 2016).

The next organization that really appealed to me is, the Center on the Social and Emotional Foundation for Early Learning (CSEFEL). The organization is part of my State’s local programs in Tennessee and part of Vanderbilt University. CSEFEL is a national resource center for disseminating research and evidence –based practices to early childhood programs across the country. CSEFEL is focused on promoting the social emotional development and school readiness of young children from birth to age 5. As a means to support their goal, the program has developed a conceptual model of evidence-based practices for promoting young children’s social emotional competence and preventing and addressing challenging behavior. The program has training materials, chat sites, resources offered to families, teachers, professionals, educators and individuals that are interested in working with young children. In consideration of this organization, training in this area would offer job opportunities as a Behavior Support Specialist that can train and educate others in working with children with challenging behaviors.  

As an international interest, I chose the Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI). This is an organization that I became familiar with during one of my courses here at Walden. This organization offers a wealth of knowledge and support on issues and trends that are prevalent in international countries. Their work experience is comparable to some of our community of practice and/or organizations here in the States. ACEI is a global community of educators and advocates who unite knowledge, experience, and perspectives in order to exchange information, explore innovation, and advocate for children.  The ACEI offers a variety of programs and sponsorships all for the purpose of children and education. One target of interests is that they are also affiliated with GPCWD which is Globall Partnership on Children with Disabilities. Their mission supports inclusiveness of all children with disabilities (ACEI, 2016). 

References:

http://www.earlylearningleaders.org

http://csefel.vanderbilt.edu/about.html

http://www.acei.org/

 

Thursday, February 25, 2016


FINAL BLOG
To All My Colleagues, 
 
This has been an amazing journey getting to know each of my colleagues during each course since the beginning of entering our Master classes. We are now moving on towards our specialization courses or that of something other. I wanted to send warm wishes and my appreciation for each of you as you all have shared a special part of who you are. Thank you so much for allowing me to learn from you as you opened up your heart to share your lives, your passions and your experiences. This has been an incredible journey and well worth the sacrifice. We are now more confident, more determined, and even more informed to make a difference in the lives of the children and families we serve!  If you should desire to keep in touch, I can be reached at the following email address: barbararob45@gmail.com.











 



 

 

Saturday, February 13, 2016


Team Building and Adjourning   
During this week’s assignment, we had the opportunity to learn much about the five stages of developing teams. The five stages presented are all considered critical progressions that help teams become successful. The stages consist of forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning. My involvement as a member of a group has been in both high-performing and low performing groups each resulting in different experiences and outcomes. I have found that the high-performing group that I have been involved has been the most difficult to leave because of the impactful results to include both emotionally and productively. There is an interconnectedness that has been established within the group that produces a sense of accomplishment. The connection, trust and camaraderie built and experienced is rewarding. Groups with the clearest vision are most successful because they are all focused on the common goal. Even though challenges will occur, if you remember the “why” and what it will take to see the end results, it is what it is all about at the end of the day. Within my workplace, my staff and I always make the comment of saying, “let’s take one for the team”, meaning we all work together regardless of the circumstance. There is no big “I’s or little “you”.   

Some of the closing rituals that we have put together is that of a celebration in which we have gone out to eat and celebrate the accomplishment and finality of the end result. During this dinner, we get to discuss some of our successes and challenges that were part of the developing process of the task. This is always a good way to end because we let each other know how much we appreciate what each individual has brought to the table and or group during each phase.

In pondering on the question about how I will adjourn from my colleagues during this master’s journey, I hopefully will have the opportunity to share in the ceremonial practice of receiving our degree. I plan to attend the graduation ceremony and walk across the stage to receive my diploma.  As names are being called out, I will remember who was in my class. But, just in case this does not happen in this way, I plan to send words of sentiments to all of my colleagues. Just as we practice at the end of all our classes we have an opportunity to send out “well wishes”. I can also stay in touch with those that desire through email and the Walden community and or telephone contact. This is an important aspect of networking and keeping in touch with colleagues that can help us stay abreast of what’s going on in the early childhood field. The adjourning stage is an essential stage because it actually represents the ending of the task. You get to reminisce over the process. As with anything, there is always an ending. This helps members celebrate one another and appreciate their part in making the task successful. Teams move on to do better and bigger things.
                                     Better is the end of a thing than its beginning” (Eccl 7:8) 

 

Saturday, February 6, 2016


 
New Conflict Resolution
One conflict that I would like to share is a recent issue at work with my boss. He has been my new boss for almost a little over a year and we are all getting to learn of  his  management  and communicative style. Our organization had received new guidance concerning our background check processing which is a critical piece in bringing new people on board. Unfortunately my new boss had been in the habit of keeping me out of the loop as it concerned my FCC program. This practice went on for quite some time and I became very frustrated with him as I wanted to know how to effectively communicate with him my thoughts and feelings. So, the opportunity presented itself so that I could talk to address the issue. He was not on the receive end as when I presented the issue he was preoccupied and really wasn’t listening but telling me what I wanted to hear. When I left the meeting I felt that this was an "unproductive conflict" that was not resolved (O'Hair, Wiemann, Mullin, & Teven (2015, p.214).  
The same practice was continuing and this time I had a major change with one of my trainers in my program. Due to the background check restraints, my numbers of FCC providers decreased therefore resulting in a decline in my support of a trainer. The decision was made by him (my boss) and our lead trainer to pull my training support. Rather than call me and have me come to his office and have a face to face conversation about his decision he sends me an email telling me that he was removing her altogether. To make a long story short, I found this to be unprofessional and disrespectful towards me. Later that morning, we had staff meeting and afterwards I was given the opportunity to talk to him again. I asked if I could have 2 minutes of his time, he agreed and I explained to him how I felt. It was not that I had my trainer taken away but it was because of his delivery of the news. I explained that I thought this was not right. This time I was upset but I had peace about the situation. This time, he intently listened, and I felt as if I had his undivided attention. I expressed that since he’s been my new boss that he has been so far removed from my FCC program and that I felt like he wasn’t interested. This time he listened, looked me in the eye and had apologized numerous times for being disinterested. His reasoning was that I had a program that he didn’t have to worry about or had major issues so he felt like he didn’t have to micromanage or be involved. I said this to say that this experience was frustrating and an eye-opener for me. I had to address the issue but had to go about it in a peaceable way and not be so upset or mad because he didn’t share the news of my program in the way in which I would have handled it.  Because I took some time to pray about the situation and waited to address it, he was on the receive end when he was confronted. As a result, I do receive emails and information from him more than I have ever before. 
Another strategy that I have learned is that you must go in peace and not be confrontational and judgmental. I’ve learned that healthy conflict is necessary and that it can provide positive feedback but also productive conflict. This situation has really taught me to always be mindful of how I am to not assume ideas about others and to communicate to them in a non-hostile approach. 
References 
O'Hair, D., Wiemann, M., Mullin, D. I., & Teven, J.  (2015). Real communication (3rd. ed). New
            York: Bedford/St. Martin's. Chapter 8, "Managing Conflict in Relationships"

 
 


Sunday, January 31, 2016

 
Communication Styles Profiles 
 
This week's assignment was interesting to find out about how I communicate and how others view my communication skills. I have found that the communication skills among the three of us were pretty much in the same range. The one thing that I found that was surprising was that the Verbal Aggressiveness Scale revealed that my score was "moderate". My assessment and the assessment from my husband and colleague were the same. I totally agree with this outcome. The outcome states, "You maintain a good balance between respect and consideration for others' viewpoint, and the ability to argue fairly by attracting the facts of a position rather than the person holding that position".  Over the years I have had to learn how to effectively relate, understand, and communicate with people even when I didn't want to see their views as important as my own. 
 
The "Listening Styles Profile" assessment provided a score but did not provide a measurement as to where my scoring might fit in. But, I can say that my assessment scores will fall either into the People-Oriented, and or Action-Oriented listening style. I believe I have a little bit of both. Since there was no way of seeing where I might fall into its hard to pinpoint. One insight I have gleaned over the years is that I am concerned with how people feel and I make it a point to not disregard their feelings and opinions. However, I have also learned that I have to also keep it moving and communicate and expect clear and to-the-point communication. As a director of a program, I have to have a balance and not be so consumed with people pleasing that may hinder direction. 
 
Two important factors about communication that I have obtained is in 'listening",  "communicating information" and "showing interest". My number one priority in communicating in both my professional and personal life is to listen to what others have to say. It is really important that you give your listening ear when someone is trying to convey information. Also, it is really important to me that I keep people fully informed of any information that pertains to them. Keeping people in the loop and aware is so important as this helps to build relationships and establishes trust. This is a practice that I do within the work place. I know firsthand that there is nothing worst than not communicating and keeping people out of the loop. This causes friction and a break down in communication in the workplace and in personal affairs.  
 
References:
 
O'Hair, D., Wiemann, M., Mullin, D. I., & Teven, J.  (2015). Real communication (3rd. ed). New York:
Bedford/St. Martin's. Chapter 2, "Perceiving the Self and Others" (pp. 45-62, beginning with "Cognitions About Ourselves") 
 
Rubin, R. B., Palmgreen, P., & Sypher, H. E. (Eds.) (2009). Communication research measures: A sourcebook. New York: Routledge. Communication Anxiety Inventory”Verbal Aggressiveness Scale.
 
Rubin, R. B., Rubin, A. M., Graham, E. E., Perse, E. M., & Seibold, D. R. (Eds.) (2009). Communication research measures II: A sourcebook. New York: Routledge.
"Listening Styles Profile-16"

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Friday, January 22, 2016


CULTURAL DIVERSITY & COMMUNICATION
As we have learned, communication is a big deal and this is what we do on an everyday basis to interconnect with others. Our world is made up of many different individuals with many different cultures that affect the way in which we can relate. Within my sphere of influence, I communicate with individuals that are different from me. Most people have a tendency to communicate with others on how intimate they are with a person. I interact with my family differently from my colleagues, coworkers, parents and children. In the past, I have found myself communicating differently with those that may have had a different culture and or background from mine. But that was because I had little interaction with them and did not know how to effectively communicate. For instance, I have a certain place where I go to have my nails done. Most of the individuals have a different ethnicity and some are unable to fully speak our language.  Most of them can speak it but just find it hard to sometimes convey what needs to be said in the English language. So, most often, what I find myself doing is when having to ask a question, I find myself speaking really slow so that they can understand me. However, if there is something that I said that they are unable to understand, I usually ask one of the other individuals that can speak the language. This is just one example that I can use but for the most part I try to treat everyone the same.

Three strategies that I can use to help me communicate more effectively is that first, I can maybe take the time to find out some of the basic words in the culture that can help me communicate and speak some of their language. When I lived in Germany and did not speak the language, I purchased a book and learned some basic key words such as hello and thank you and good morning and etc. This helped me until I became comfortable with interacting and speaking some of the words to get by.  

The second strategy that I can use is to befriend or spend time with an individual of that culture. I have also done this as this helped me to better understand their culture and have the opportunity to ask questions about the things that I wanted to learn about. Sometimes this is a better approach than assuming some things that I might see or have questions about as well.

The third strategy is that I can take the time to not carefully listen to others. I have developed the skill to become a good listener. I enjoy this but I believe this is important because everyone wants to be listened too. When you learn to listen you can learn about a person in the way in which they talk and in things that they say or not say is important.